Provenance before
authority.
The site is an independent critique and a research design, not an edition of Wikipedia and not a deployed scientific certification service.
Wikipedia reuse and attribution
Each dossier displays an introductory excerpt from a specific English Wikipedia article. That excerpt is shortened and line breaks may be normalized; see the exact revision permalink beside it for the full context, contributor history and upstream citations. Wikipedia contributors retain attribution; reused textual excerpts are governed by CC BY-SA 4.0, linked on every dossier. The independent criticism and proposed replacements are explicitly distinguished and do not imply Wikimedia endorsement.
Operational epistemic boundaries
Source citations establish what texts informed this critique, not that the critique is experimentally proven. A linked Wikipedia definition is not evidence that the encyclopedia claims existing science is perfect. The source index is a versioned starting corpus; a refreshed source revision requires renewed editorial consideration if its substance changes.
Machine-checkable proofs certify mathematical statements relative to their axioms and translations; they do not certify physical truth. Automated meta-analysis may amplify selection bias. A computational auditor can hallucinate objections. Research involving people requires consent, safety controls and legitimate human authorization.