What the reference describes.
The design of experiments (DOE), also known as experimental design, refers to the construction of procedures that attempt to explain how changes in one aspect of a system will lead to changes in other aspects of a system. In general, the design of experiments involves decisions about which aspects of the system to change and which to control based on hypotheses about the sources of variance in the aspects of the system considered by the experimenter. DOE is generally associated with experiments where the design introduces conditions that directly affect the variation, but DOE may also refer to the design of quasi-experiments, in which natural conditions that influence the variation are selected for observation.
What the process still cannot guarantee.
Fixed-factor plans are often selected before observing the full information structure of a problem.
That is a design criticism of how this research operation may be used, not a claim that the encyclopedia endorses the limitation. In this domain, the general redesign question is: experiments are selected to distinguish competing models, with physical measurements and safety retaining authority.
Replace the mechanism.
Choose experiments adaptively to maximize safe expected discrimination among competing models.
Implementation requires a typed scientific claim, explicit operational definitions, controlled access to evidence, an immutable record of relevant transformations, and independent checking appropriate to the kind of assertion. An AI-generated interpretation without those checks would reproduce the underlying failure at greater speed.
What would demonstrate improvement?
Compare adaptive and factorial designs under the same measurement budget.
Compare with a defined baseline under matched resources, keep evaluation cases independent of the system under test, and measure both false alarms and undetected errors. Publish any negative or inconclusive result as part of the same investigation record.
Continue across concepts.
Each related title has its own revision-specific Wikipedia source and a separate critical dossier. Crosslinks are exploratory; they do not imply the encyclopedia articles support the proposed replacement.
No single authority.
The reference article establishes the historical and methodological subject under examination. The proposed criticism and replacement must earn their own support through reproducible tests and independent validation. Record disagreements instead of silently overwriting them.
Current Wikipedia article ↗ · Exact reference revision ↗ · Complete source ledger ↗